I get 20 t/s with a 70B 2.5bpw model, but this is only 47% of the theoretical maximum of 3090.

In comparison, the benchmarks on the exl2 github homepage show 35 t/s, which is 76% the theoretical maximum of 4090.

The bandwidth differences between the two GPUs aren’t huge, 4090 is only 7-8% higher.

Why? Does anyone else have a similar 20 t/s ? I don’t think my cpu performance is the issue.

The benchmarks also show ~85% utilization on 34B on 4bpw (normal models)

  • brobruh211@alien.top
    BEnglish
    1·
    1 year ago

    Hi! What are your settings for Ooba to get this to work? On Windows 11 on a single 3090, I keep getting CUDA out of memory error trying to load a 2.4bpw 70B model with just 4k context. It’s annoying because this used to work but after a recent update it just won’t load anymore.

    • Aaaaaaaaaeeeee@alien.topOPBEnglish
      1·
      1 year ago

      8k with 2.4bpw and 20 t/s, the vram usage says 23.85/24.00 gb.

      16k with 2.4bpw 20 t/s with fp8 cache

      I have 0.5-0.6gb used for driving the monitor graphics on ubuntu.

      Did you disable the nvidia system memory fallback that they pushed on Windows users? That’s probably what you need.

      • brobruh211@alien.top
        BEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for the detailed answer! Ubuntu does seem to be much more memory-efficient compared to Windows. However, the problem just fixed itself seemingly overnight. Now I’m not running into out of memory errors. 8-bit cache is a godsend for vram efficiency.