It was definitely around the point in which the employees said they were ready to bail and Microsoft said they had spaces open that the double back became necessary.
As shareholders who held some opinions so strongly that they fired the CEO has definitely not a position you want to be in.
It’s definitely really intriguing to think about someone firing a CEO. Like what could possibly be considered too far when companies like Blizzard actively defend sexual harassment.
Basically means the people have spoken and it’s out of the hands of the shareholders and in the hands of the CEO whatever he got fired for.
It was definitely around the point in which the employees said they were ready to bail and Microsoft said they had spaces open that the double back became necessary.
As shareholders who held some opinions so strongly that they fired the CEO has definitely not a position you want to be in.
It’s definitely really intriguing to think about someone firing a CEO. Like what could possibly be considered too far when companies like Blizzard actively defend sexual harassment.
Basically means the people have spoken and it’s out of the hands of the shareholders and in the hands of the CEO whatever he got fired for.