CAI/LaMDA and PI are trained more on convos than facts and QA. So they appear more “real” and personable.
I don’t think we have an open model like that yet. Trained, not finetuned. Hence no new Blake Lemoines and a distinct feeling of “lack” when interacting.
Why do you think it’s important to differentiate based on whether model is fine-tuned or is a base one? Do you have sources to confirm that LaMDA that was used by this guy wasn’t just a generalist model like base llama 65b finetuned on conversations? Basically Samantha LaMDA.
CAI/LaMDA and PI are trained more on convos than facts and QA. So they appear more “real” and personable.
I don’t think we have an open model like that yet. Trained, not finetuned. Hence no new Blake Lemoines and a distinct feeling of “lack” when interacting.
That’s my crackpot theory.
So you saying, basically a lame google version of pygmalion…
Why do you think it’s important to differentiate based on whether model is fine-tuned or is a base one? Do you have sources to confirm that LaMDA that was used by this guy wasn’t just a generalist model like base llama 65b finetuned on conversations? Basically Samantha LaMDA.